William A. Patterson

Martindale Hubbell logoWILLIAM A. PATTERSON (Bill) was born in Jackson, Mississippi in 1955. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree with highest honors from Mississippi State University in 1977, and his Doctor of Law from Emory University in 1980. Mr. Patterson served as Special Assistant Attorney General, 1981-83, and was Chief Legal Counsel for the Mississippi Department of Health, 1983-84. Mr. Patterson was selected to serve as a statewide mediator in a program administered by the Administrative Law Section of the Mississippi State Bar and the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission. He is currently a member of the Hinds County, the Mississippi and American Bar Associations, and the Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association. Mr. Patterson's practice is one of general insurance defense in both state and federal courts, including civil rights cases, along with all matters before the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission, such as self-insured hearings and standard defense work.

Current Employment Position(s):

Year Joined Organization:

Litigation Percentage:

Bar Admissions:

Education:

Professional Associations and Memberships:

Past Employment Positions:

Recent Trial Decisions:

Jones v. NL Industries, United States District Court, Civil Action No. 4:03cv229-M-B

Bill Patterson and Robert Stephenson defended this lead paint lawsuit brought on behalf of 14 minors seeking approximately $28,000,000 in itemized damages. After a three week trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants as to all plaintiffs. The district court thereafter denied the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed this decision.

Summary Judgments:

Bishop v. Alfa, United States District Court (June, 2011)

Bill Patterson was granted summary judgment for his client, Alfa Insurance Corporation, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi based on exclusions in the homeowners’ policies for damage caused by Chinese drywall. Alfa Mutual was sued after denying coverage under its homeowners’ policies for damage to a residence that had been built with Chinese drywall.  Mr.  Patterson argued in his respective motion that no coverage was afforded under the policies because of policy exclusions for “latent defect,” “inherent vice,” “faulty materials,” “contamination” and “corrosion.”